![]() But the Jewish historian Josephus quotes the Babylonian historian Berossus, showing that the Biblical account of three separate Babylonian attacks on Judah is accurate ( Against Apion, I 19 and Antiquities, X 11, 1). This is based on the fact that this invasion in 605 B.C. Some say that this mention of the siege of Jerusalem is a historical blunder made by a pseudo-Daniel. There would be two later invasions (597 and 587 B.C.). and it was the first (but not the last) encounter between Nebuchadnezzar and Jehoiakim. Along the way (or on the way back), he subdued Jerusalem, which had been loyal to the Pharaoh of Egypt. In response, the young prince Nebuchadnezzar defeated the Egyptians at Charchemish, then he pursued their fleeing army all the way down to the Sinai. Came to Jerusalem and besieged it: Nebuchadnezzar came against Jerusalem because the Pharaoh of Egypt invaded Babylon. The name Nebuchadnezzar is a Hebrew transliteration of the Babylonian name Nebu-kudduri-utzur, which means “Nebu protects the crown.”Ĭ. Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon: This was the mighty ruler of the Babylonian Empire. His name means “Yahweh raises up,” but the LORD did not raise him up at all – Pharaoh did.ī. ![]() Jehoiakim king of Judah: This was a Judean king placed on the throne by the Pharaoh of Egypt. And the Lord gave Jehoiakim king of Judah into his hand, with some of the articles of the house of God, which he carried into the land of Shinar to the house of his god and he brought the articles into the treasure house of his god.Ī. In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it. There is also a linguistic argument made against the Book of Daniel, claiming that certain Greek words used in Daniel are words that did not come into the Hebrew vocabulary until the second century B.C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |